Skip to main content
Policy Workbench

Prototype for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Built on public data; not an official OPM system.

Powered by Concourse

Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of San Mateo County, California, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area

Federal Register

88 FR 1133

Text

18 passages

88 FR 1133Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of San Mateo County, California, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area

Agency

88 FR 1133Office of Personnel Management.

Summary

88 FR 1133The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in San Mateo County, and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.

Dates

88 FR 1133Effective date: This regulation is effective February 8, 2023. Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after February 8, 2023.

For Further Information Contact

88 FR 1133Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

88 FR 1133On September 21, 2022, OPM issued a proposed rule (87 FR 57651) to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, NAF FWS wage area. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus. The 30-day comment period ended on October 21, 2022. OPM received one comment in support of the proposal to define San Mateo County, CA, to the Monterey, CA wage area.

Regulatory Impact Analysis

88 FR 1133This action is not a “significant regulatory action” under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

88 FR 1133OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees.

Federalism

88 FR 1133We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.

Civil Justice Reform

88 FR 1133This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.

Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

88 FR 1133This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

Congressional Review Act

88 FR 1133This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and organization and does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a “rule” as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

88 FR 1133This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

88 FR 1133Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. Office of Personnel Management. Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

Regulatory text — 5 CFR Part 532

88 FR 11331. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

Authority

Regulatory text — 5 CFR Part 532

88 FR 11332. In Appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage area listing for the State of California to read as follows:

Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas

88 FR 1133* * * * * CALIFORNIA Kern Survey Area California: Kern Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: Fresno Kings Los Angeles Survey Area California: Los Angeles Area of Application. Survey area. Monterey Survey Area California: Monterey Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: San Mateo Santa Clara Orange Survey Area California: Orange Area of Application. Survey area. Riverside Survey Area California: Riverside Area of Application. Survey area. Sacramento Survey Area California: Sacramento Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: Yuba Oregon: Jackson Klamath San Bernadino Survey Area California: San Bernadino Area of Application. Survey area. San Diego Survey Area California: San Diego Area of Application. Survey area. San Joaquin Survey Area California: San Joaquin Area of Application. Survey area. Santa Barbara Survey Area California: Santa Barbara Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: San Luis Obispo Solano Survey Area California: Solano Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco Sonoma Ventura Survey Area California: Ventura Area of Application. Survey area.

About

Type
Final rule
Citation
88 FR 1133
Published
2023-01-09
Effective
2023-02-08
Action
Final rule.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in San Mateo County, and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.

This document rescinds or replaces

Cites