Prototype for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Built on public data; not an official OPM system.
Powered by Concourse
§ 430.305 System standards for SES performance management systems
Regulation
5 CFR 430.305
Text
17 passages
5 CFR 430.305(a)(a) Each agency performance management system must incorporate the following system standards:
5 CFR 430.305(a)(1)(1) Use critical elements based on OPM-validated executive competencies to evaluate executive leadership and results, including the quality of the executive's performance;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(2)(2) Align performance requirements with agency mission and strategic planning initiatives;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(3)(3) Define performance standards for each of the summary rating performance levels, which also may be used for the individual elements or performance requirements being appraised;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(4)(4) Appraise each senior executive's performance at least annually against performance requirements based on established performance standards and other measures;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(5)(5) Derive an annual summary rating through a mathematical method that ensures executives' performance aligns with level descriptors contained in performance standards that clearly differentiate levels above fully successful;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(6) Establish five summary performance levels as follows:
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(i)(i) An outstanding level;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(ii)(ii) An exceeds fully successful level;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(iii)(iii) A fully successful level;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(iv)(iv) A minimally satisfactory level; and
5 CFR 430.305(a)(6)(v)(v) An unsatisfactory level;
5 CFR 430.305(a)(7)(7) Include equivalency statements in the system description for agency-specific terms for the five summary performance levels aligning them with the five performance levels required in § 430.305(a)(6); and
5 CFR 430.305(a)(8)(8) Use performance appraisals as a basis to adjust pay, reward, retain, and develop senior executives or make other personnel decisions, including removals as specified in § 430.312.
5 CFR 430.305(b)(b) An agency may develop its own performance management system for senior executives in accordance with the requirements of this section.
5 CFR 430.305(c)(c) OPM may establish, and refine as needed, a basic performance management system incorporating all requirements of this section, which agencies may adopt, with limited adaptation, for performance management of its senior executives.
5 CFR 430.305(d)(d) OPM may establish, and refine as needed, a forced distribution of SES rating levels which agencies must apply when rating SES members, except that noncareer SES members may be excluded from such forced distribution requirements, as determined by OPM.
About
- Type
- Regulation section
- Citation
- 5 CFR 430.305
- Last amended
- 2025-10-15
Amendment history
- 2025-10-15System standards for SES performance management systems
- 2025-09-15System standards for SES performance management systems
- 2016-12-27System standards for SES performance management systems
Cited by
- FY 2026 Standardized Distribution of Rating Levels and FY 2026 Performance Awards Guidance for Federal EmployeesMemo · 2026-09-21
- Managing Senior Professional PerformanceFederal Register · 2026-02-24
- Performance Appraisal for General Schedule, Prevailing Rate, and Certain Other EmployeesFederal Register · 2026-02-24
- Assuring Responsive and Accountable Federal Executive ManagementFederal Register · 2025-09-15
- Assuring Responsive and Accountable Federal Executive ManagementFederal Register · 2025-05-02
- New Senior Executive Service Performance Appraisal System and Performance Plan, and Guidance on Next Steps for Agencies to Implement Restoring Accountability for Career Senior ExecutivesMemo · 2025-02-25
- Performance Appraisal System CertificationFederal Register · 2017-01-19
- Managing Senior Executive PerformanceFederal Register · 2015-09-25
- Managing Senior Executive PerformanceFederal Register · 2014-12-10
- MANAGING SENIOR EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCEFederal Register · 2000-10-13
- Managing Senior Executive PerformanceFederal Register · 2000-06-21